Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:03:26 +0200 From: Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch> To: FreeBSD-Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 Message-ID: <1337627006.18702.10.camel@bigapple> In-Reply-To: <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz> References: <CA%2BdUSyp2ztuZdCocnpNCgf-h%2BJO4zMMFEMi_xrm8nbwQ2W9How@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_-UOWSc_suztjLBk0xYu_wu1TSN29Nwarn=nsFRv_TFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FBA618A.1050707@freebsd.org> <20120521155736.GA79323@DataIX.net> <4FBA6FEB.1000706@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 18:40 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I think that the best will be to not have any default "php5" port and > just use php52, php53, php54, php5X, php60... as we have apache20, > apache22, apache24, or mysql50-server, mysql51-server, mysql55-server. +1 I really appreciate Alex's work, and seeing these lines : php5-5.3.13 < needs updating (port has 5.4.3) php5-bz2-5.3.13 < needs updating (port has 5.4.3) php5-ctype-5.3.13 < needs updating (port has 5.4.3) php5-curl-5.3.13 < needs updating (port has 5.4.3) [...] in my cron-based portaudit/portversion output always means some extra work to keep a stable server running even after some simple freebsd-updated and portupgrade -arvbp... (-> first put php5 on HOLD in pkgtools.conf, then "dowgrade" from php5 to php53, etc... or even some work with portdowngrade). So this solution without a default php5 port would be perfect here, IMHO of course :-) Kind regards & have a nice week, Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1337627006.18702.10.camel>