From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 9 23:45:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA25333 for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (root@grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA25327 Fri, 9 Feb 1996 23:45:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA27983; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:44:50 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199602100744.JAA27983@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host mark@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: dima@FreeBSD.ORG (Dima Ruban) cc: imp@village.org (Warner Losh), ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:44:50 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > We're running the Cygnus Kerberos, so I can't comment on ebones. > > Looks like the same stuff... > > Is eBones compatible with KerberosIV? I mean, I have kerberos on > some of my computers, and I've heard encryption (or something else) isn't > compatible beetween kerberos and ebones. So, basically the question is: > will I be able to use eBones/kerberos encryption if I go from > kerberos machine to eBones server? A couple of years ago when Geoff Rehmet and others ported Kerberos/eBones it was tested against a known good Kerberos system. I suppose now is the time to see if it still good. The DES library used in freeBSD has been around for a while and is well respected, even to the extent of being used in Kerberos5. (This is Eric Young's DES library.) M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key