From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 8 14:16:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0341737B663; Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA05566; Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:16:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Bill Fumerola Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/18454: Conflict: 'nedit' and 'netcat' ports. In-Reply-To: <200005082110.OAA89419@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 8 May 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > No. Carefull, Bill, you're turning into Garrett Wollman :-) Perhaps what Bill meant to say is that nc (as netcat) is used by a lot of other software and scripts out there, all of whom expect it to be in the canonical name 'nc'. nedit is the one which should be changed since (AFAIK) nothing else relies on it being called that. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message