Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:50:58 +0600 From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, frank <frank@dynamical-systems.org> Subject: Re: ports/175104: [PATCH] net/libosip: update to 4.0.0 Message-ID: <CA%2BnPUkyCPx_BcgXmtD%2BWY4dg_e4SKanaD9rjZ5pAZSakKs9KbA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <515011F5.8050101@yandex.ru> References: <CA%2BnPUkzxmb=tMkQYrOsmfL-71gM_puhnwEvUighsvAXks9SwAA@mail.gmail.com> <514F40E4.6060208@yandex.ru> <514F426A.9090108@yandex.ru> <CA%2BnPUkx3O53efbciXjqNAjnT0W=54LQPQ8h9hf61%2BqWdVJBj9g@mail.gmail.com> <515011F5.8050101@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Ruslan. I think we need to modify the siproxd and libexosip too. But I have got a new patch for libexosip too. Should I create a patch for it or wait for libosip to complete? Regards, Muhammad On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>wrote: > Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote on 24.03.2013 23:08: > > Hi Ruslan, >> >> Do we need to do it in a REPOCOPY style? Or plain simple new port? >> >> Regards, >> Muhammad >> > > Yes, net/libosip will be svn cp'ed to net/libosip24 and then your patch > applied to it (with you as maintainer). I'll try to do that later this day. > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru >> >wrote: >> >> Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 24.03.2013 22:07: >>> >>> Hi Muhammad, >>> >>>> >>>> Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote on 24.03.2013 17:41: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> Can anyone please take care of ports/175104? It has been a while and I >>>>> need >>>>> to update libexosip2, which is dependent on this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Muhammad >>>>> >>>>> >>>> net/siproxd fails to build with this version of libosip [1] (and builds >>>> fine with 3.6.0), so or this update should be coordinated with siproxd >>>> maintainer (cc:ed) or it should be added to the tree as libosip24 or >>>> something. The first one is preferred, because there is newer version of >>>> siproxd that may work with new libosip. >>>> >>>> [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/****siproxd-0.7.2_3.log<http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/**siproxd-0.7.2_3.log>; >>>> <http://**people.freebsd.org/~rm/**siproxd-0.7.2_3.log<http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/siproxd-0.7.2_3.log>; >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> Looks like the first one will fail because 0.8.1 also requires libosip2 >>> (3.x.x), according to release notes [1]. It may worth to check, but I'm >>> afraid it will be new port. >>> >>> [1] http://siproxd.sourceforge.****net/index.php?op=relnotes<http** >>> ://siproxd.sourceforge.net/**index.php?op=relnotes<http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/index.php?op=relnotes>; >>> > >>> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BnPUkyCPx_BcgXmtD%2BWY4dg_e4SKanaD9rjZ5pAZSakKs9KbA>