Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:59:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: fixing NFS related sysctl naming Message-ID: <237603556.1045829.1304603965877.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Right now there are separate name paths for sysctls used by the two NFS clients, which is awkward since scripts like to play with them (currently using "vfs.nfs" which is the old one). One thought I had was moving the SYSCTL()s and the global variables they manipulate into the "nfslock" modules, which is shared by both clients, so that changing "vfs.nfs.xxx" will affect both NFS clients concurrently. How does this idea sound? Any other suggestions on how to best deal with this? Thanks in advance for any comment, rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?237603556.1045829.1304603965877.JavaMail.root>