From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Jun 10 23:16:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCB1BF81DA; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1775662D1; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 191775EC3; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:16:47 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Mark Felder , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r443039 - branches/2017Q2 Message-ID: <20170610231647.GA99407@FreeBSD.org> References: <201706091946.v59JkB4D050200@repo.freebsd.org> <1497037780.167039.1004506896.6EE77BCC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <26f1138a-5b9d-1817-2ddc-a5f876df75df@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26f1138a-5b9d-1817-2ddc-a5f876df75df@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:16:48 -0000 On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:51:15PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 09/06/2017 ?? 21:49, Mark Felder a ??crit : > > This was a no-op and was not supposed to be committed. I accidentally > > hit "yes" but did not fill in an "Approved by:" line and it allowed the > > commit anyway, so I believe the pre-commit hook is broken at the moment. > > The pre-commit hook is working just fine, the thing is, you *are* a > member of portmgr, so you get the "I'm god" treatment, and subversion > goes along with it :-) Shouldn't it still require an explicit "(implicit)" line in this case? ./danfe