From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 20:43:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6DB16A417 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8FF13C480 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so2755649pyb for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:43:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fcSwyCPlBLaehdxEHJbCYnK8U2CEx1DAfHZAav8DDCw=; b=M8MgTa+Q6PwDbWbVwOE0j4BmO61HmsZNTbmB2ebbuwDFWUyq6AEbHCTfOOkzaL8MLhp9PYO85dU+05sOdMIxccYNKLvvmAEpOu/Ow28izbp7ZX8nJoRihz+M2vPmD8CURf6c5l85NTrCgTbRNqpYdoPac7eaOJQ3odDJ50w7YfM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J359Nho2wpyT6ljMO6yKbjzhuEXpBc4Hyj/f+Oy0HJpsaC3QyMLOki7svA/GXV+zrNXYSnKhY6+iaqrRN/FCCbWfBO4pN8lQSA7y1ODw2WYQwChTdFOcsblPWUHzWTGHfoUtD8ZEIB/L7o1JjoeWbsdGIrbJUDW4J4V0VnIHSM0= Received: by 10.35.115.18 with SMTP id s18mr5148331pym.1194209034137; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.110.17 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:43:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0711041243s37ef92e3i9c5c79827f547dbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 15:43:54 -0500 From: "Josh Carroll" To: "Jeff Roberson" In-Reply-To: <20071104122546.S544@10.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8cb6106e0710230902x4edf2c8eu2d912d5de1f5d4a2@mail.gmail.com> <8cb6106e0711021306w10c48a15s99eab526064ac814@mail.gmail.com> <20071102150028.R544@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0711021839i4714bdfbh74d412b3e14e808@mail.gmail.com> <8cb6106e0711031227t1e829969s2e6062e1db5167af@mail.gmail.com> <20071103121921.M544@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0711031416l4183e2beueb87fade0d56f504@mail.gmail.com> <20071103133711.Q544@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0711032221i2ecf1d59ge82f368d4162a827@mail.gmail.com> <20071104122546.S544@10.0.0.1> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:43:57 -0000 > Josh, I included one too many changes in the diff and it made the results > ambiguous. I've scaled it back slightly by removing the changes to > sched_pickcpu() and included the patch in this email again. Can you run > through your tests once more? I'd like to commit this part soon as it > helps in other cases. I'm most interested in the buildworld numbers for > now. Sure, I can run through them. Should I change the slice_min value at all during testing to compare different values? Or is that part of the other patch that is not included in this (haven't fetched and grep'd it yet). :) I'll get the benchmark numbers as soon as I can. Thanks, Josh