From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 19 08:16:12 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA19186 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 08:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA19179 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 08:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA14564; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:15:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:15:44 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9512191615.AA14564@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Terry Lambert Cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 (or more) LAN interface on SAME subnet ? In-Reply-To: <199512190038.RAA13141@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <9512182157.AA08392@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199512190038.RAA13141@phaeton.artisoft.com> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk < said: >> This is not true. The Internet Architecture requires that logical >> subnets be fully-connected. The BSD Architecture requires that every >> network interface be connected to a unique subnet. > You mean "logical network interface", right? No, I don't. I mean ``network interface driver instance''. > Otherwise you're saying you can't use bridges on subnets... No, I'm saying that you can use BSD to implement a bridge. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant