From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 7 03:29:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194FB16A4DA for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 03:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ormandj@corenode.com) Received: from zone2.corenode.com (zone2.corenode.com [66.91.129.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD61443D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 03:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ormandj@corenode.com) Received: from [10.0.1.22] ([66.8.217.8]) by zone2.corenode.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J2000KARKF50S00@zone2.corenode.com> for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:30:41 -1000 (HST) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:28:55 -1000 From: "David J. Orman" In-reply-to: To: Francisco Reyes Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: Cc: FreeBSD ISP Subject: Re: IAMP servers in FreeBSD for ISP X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 03:29:03 -0000 I had good luck with Dovecot and a few thousand accounts (some with over 5 gigs of mail) prior to switching over to JES (JES is great, but wait for version 5 if you are interested. 4 is very, very complex to get working properly.) So, Dovecot for now, JES5 if you are interested once it's released (I believe 4th quarter '06). http://www.sun.com/software/javaenterprisesystem/ Yes, JES is free now (without support.) David On Jul 6, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Anyone care to share what IMAP servers they have found to scale best? > > We are currently using courier and at times it seems it really will > not scale well into thousands of emails. > > We have basically one setup with self contained machines that do > all the work and a second setup where we break the load into MX > machines, NFS to store the maildir for courier and front end > machines to run courier and NFS. > > We can handle hundreds of accounts in the self contained, more or > less ok (depending on the mix of pop or imap). > > The second setup is more complex to meassure since the load is > distributed. The biggest problem with this second setup is that the > front end machines end up needing to mount several of the Maildir > NFS servers and we have found that one of the NFS servers going > down can affect all of the front end machines. > > What have others found to scale well and what kind of hardware are > you using? _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"