From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 02:24:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5CB37B404 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:24:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [205.130.220.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0586B43FB1 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 02:24:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2RAOGZ78047 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 05:24:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 05:24:16 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson To: arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030327052055.X64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Subject: Threading code review please. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:24:18 -0000 I'm going to reply to the threads on 1:1 vs M:N tomorrow. I'd like to request that people actually read the patch and give me feedback on the code and not the approach. I have no outstanding behavior problems with mozilla. It actually runs much faster now with libthr in place of libc_r. On pages with LOTS of images it scrolls much smoother. I suspect its the amount of io waits. Anyway, since this is coming together so well I'd like to get it commited soon so people can start giving me bug reports. I have another full days worth of work to clear up the issues that I know of. I'll probably post the library source tomorrow. Cheers, Jeff