Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 16:26:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261036] [patch] rc.d/jail: Support multiple _startN and _stopN variables Message-ID: <bug-261036-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261036 Bug ID: 261036 Summary: [patch] rc.d/jail: Support multiple _startN and _stopN variables Product: Base System Version: 13.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: conf Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: thomas@gibfest.dk Created attachment 230822 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D230822&action= =3Dedit A patch to support having multiple jail _startN and _stopN commands Hello, I've been running with the attached patch for /etc/rc.d/jail for a few years now.=20 It enables having multiple "jail_jailname_start0" "jail_jailname_start1" "jail_jailname_start2" etc (and the same for stop) variables when using leg= acy variables to configure jails. This is already supported for _prestart, _poststart, _prestop, and _poststop, but for some reason _start and _stop w= ere left out. In case I missed something and the patch isn't as trivial as I thought then please let me know or just close this as wontfix and I will keep running wi= th the patch locally :) Thanks! :) ps. I care about this because I use /etc/rc.conf.d/jail files written by ansible to configure jails. I prefer it to jail.conf because they can be written by sysrc and they are easier to maintain from configuration managem= ent compared to jail.conf(.d). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261036-227>