From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 6 13: 4:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com [171.71.163.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82E037B424 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:04:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA04611; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f36K4Vc96330; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:04:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200104062004.f36K4Vc96330@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Roger Marquis Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/security being maintained? (ntpd/ftpd/...) In-Reply-To: References: Comments: In-reply-to Roger Marquis message dated "Wed, 04 Apr 2001 20:11:13 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_338369850P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 13:04:31 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_338369850P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Roger Marquis wrote: > Is anyone maintaining http://www.freebsd.org/security/? I ask > because it hasn't been updated in over a month and contains no > information on the ntpd or ftpd vulnerabilities. Well, for the ntpd problem, that just cropped up in the last 48 hours, and the latest commits to -CURRENT and -STABLE happened within the last 4 hours. It's kind of premature to issue an advisory before the problem has been completely fixed...give security-officer@ a break, already... :-) That being said, you do have a point in that the Web page isn't up-to-date. I'll add that the FTP archive of advisories is missing several files as well. As a result, the release notes cross-reference security advisories that no one can find (specifically 01:28 and 01:29). I don't know if this more the domain of the Web site maintainers or the security-officer team, but it'd be real nice to get these two things fixed up before 4.3-RELEASE. Anyone? Thanks from Mr. Relnotes. Cheers, Bruce. --==_Exmh_338369850P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6ziFO2MoxcVugUsMRAus/AKD51aIPwzEKiDr0MUNJNwyYTTIVdgCfWq8A KXdX42Elg3hMjRfMTY7LhaI= =GnfW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_338369850P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message