From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 00:45:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CA63785D2 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BNk6h1GJLz46XJ for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 00:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <2b2b28ea-827f-fc62-3e6a-f8b6fa064e76@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:45:45 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2b2b28ea-827f-fc62-3e6a-f8b6fa064e76@selasky.org> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3652.0.5.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BNk6h1GJLz46XJ X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.72 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.936]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.38)[-0.381]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 00:45:49 -0000 On 05 Aug 2020, at 04:59, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > 2) Should portsnap be a wrapper for GIT/SVN whatever is used? Yes, this seems like a very obvious thing to do as it will minimize = disruption for the most users. Not everyone has any use for git our any need to learn git syntax. A = "portsnap" wrapper that duplicates existing functionality should be part = of this change. --=20 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.