Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 18:45:45 -0600 From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap Message-ID: <B1232A5F-A9BB-44D1-B908-05B7FDDDE35B@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <2b2b28ea-827f-fc62-3e6a-f8b6fa064e76@selasky.org> References: <b920d0e6-72d3-b37c-e57e-6d027292e8db@FreeBSD.org> <2b2b28ea-827f-fc62-3e6a-f8b6fa064e76@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05 Aug 2020, at 04:59, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> wrote: > 2) Should portsnap be a wrapper for GIT/SVN whatever is used? Yes, this seems like a very obvious thing to do as it will minimize = disruption for the most users. Not everyone has any use for git our any need to learn git syntax. A = "portsnap" wrapper that duplicates existing functionality should be part = of this change. --=20 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B1232A5F-A9BB-44D1-B908-05B7FDDDE35B>