From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 11:05:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A44916A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:05:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA0043FCB for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:05:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hB3J5r6q006483; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:05:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:05:44 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Peter Pentchev Message-Id: <20031203140544.3d64576c.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031203141913.GH3327@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <20031202160640.1df85804.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031202232141.GG71732@unixpages.org> <20031202211030.1631d5be.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031203140244.GE24927@seekingfire.com> <20031203141913.GH3327@straylight.m.ringlet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Round two of the front page structure changes... X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:05:57 -0000 On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:13 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:02:44AM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:10:30PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > Yes, too many can be overwhelming. I'm thinking of ways to get > > > around this. If we do site cleanup, then perhaps we can break > > > things up a bit. Like this: > > > > > > Front page > > > Support ---- America -- links, documentation, ... > > > Other -- links to sites, translated docs, ... > > > > Should that be ``English'', ``American'' not (yet) being a language? Or > > am I missing a clue as to what you're meaning? :-) > > I think he might have been referring to America (without the 'n') as > a geographical location, not as a language :) Guess I made an 'ooops'. This could be a language choice or a regional choice. I'm open! :) Finally got your attention, huh Peter? :) -- Tom Rhodes