From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct  3 10:54:22 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA13959
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:54:22 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA13953
          ; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:54:16 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA01465; Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:53:16 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199510031753.KAA01465@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Some patches to syscons
To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:53:16 -0700 (MST)
Cc: imb@scgt.oz.au, serg@bcs1.bcs.zaporizhzhe.ua, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199510030842.BAA27975@freefall.freebsd.org> from "sos@FreeBSD.ORG" at Oct 3, 95 01:42:06 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 364       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> The ESCx sequence is not in any of the SCO docs that I have
> access to, anybody ??

No.  It is a violation of ANSI sequence processing semantics and should
not be implemented.  Besides, SCO doesn't (didn't?) support it...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.