Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:06:58 -0400
From:      Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots
Message-ID:  <20121011130658.GP10429@glenbarber.us>
In-Reply-To: <5076BEDB.4020503@orange.fr>
References:  <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <CAN6yY1v0CHXz-FE=1OZmTvY4T5SmSX5zLvrzL1PzWGMeLSmTHg@mail.gmail.com> <op.wlzmeqzkg7njmm@michael-think> <20121011000901.GK10429@glenbarber.us> <50761430.8090306@orange.fr> <20121011005218.GM10429@glenbarber.us> <5076A28D.509@orange.fr> <20121011113417.GN10429@glenbarber.us> <5076BEDB.4020503@orange.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote:
> I do not see a real interest of filling a PR for cvsup1.fr. I have just d=
one the
> same test with the same result with cvsup5.de and cvsup10.us.
>=20
> www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-mirrors/ have all cvsup mirrors in red, and =
IIRC
> someone wrote on hubs@ that the current test for mirrors was flawed becau=
se it
> tried at a now inexistent file. And someone else wrote that the project d=
oes not
> want anymore mirrors which are not under its direct control.
>=20

I will do what I can to look into this.

> It is clear that there have been a problem at least with lists.freebsd.or=
g, but
> what astonishes me is the fact that in our glorious 21th century, nobody =
thought
> to inform people on the mailing lists, or on the home page of www.freebsd=
=2Eorg
> (no, I do not want to be on Twitter or FaceBook for that kind of informat=
ion).
>=20

I absolutely understand, and appreciate your input about this.  I am
sorry that you feel people within the Project do not care.  But, I
assure you, that is not the case.

I cannot speak for anyone but myself in the Project, but as someone who
has direct access to make such a chanage to the FreeBSD.org website, I
apologize for the lack of announcement.  You are right - there should
have been some sort of "Some services may be disrupted for a bit", or
similar there.  I am sorry this was not done.

> Thank you for taking the pain of reading my emails.
>=20

Thank you for taking the time to outline your concerns.

Glen


--51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQdsRyAAoJEFJPDDeguUajvE0IAKu7X3EC6k3C+24HXwqvd423
a6zbREHLzF4J4k3PRNhW7SoJt7iB1t1eQRSQyas/XwPUn0DHQVrNHfVBfPd8G5ms
91N/C1be9r5V+REe8Zb8vmWm8NinJovO26aKdXSgX8Mcgnf8hHLhTv84TPYEOpcG
FmZFgb/p9NKwlvXUPexXLQPBP5TZvIy87pAMNxNI2QNkk9681Ta8/b8DO0sf0RxW
6JifE34n61nk7gvcZIX5nyS27AaeBoUSOzeLjd+JmZ2Rl0P+47ATLb6y418afzrA
4Adeqs8Q1mWeJ2EBtfHP2LPgz+VX96TCcRCrwcCsWFg2Gte/pcsEvWy3yCq37t4=
=00Cf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121011130658.GP10429>