Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:48:59 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Jared Barneck <rhyous@yahoo.com> Cc: "freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org" <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for advice Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkoia6NaGc7cL=AdrFvYmkW7ch8h4SegExR_wQqbv5SyQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1339535735.68084.YahooMailNeo@web130203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <CA%2BWntOu5BvUG4NJ2H=giRc4s%2BaDYDZo84t%2BaovjyDitccA0UPg@mail.gmail.com> <1339521411.94879.YahooMailClassic@web181205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1339535735.68084.YahooMailNeo@web130203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 June 2012 14:15, Jared Barneck <rhyous@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I'm curious. When will the >>> examination cover other architectures such >>> as POWER/PowerPC, SPARC, and ARM? >>> Having an exam for such architectures would get the BSDs >>> recognition >>> as a reliable system with the Power group. Support for ARM >>> in the exam >>> could increase the use of the BSDs in embedded devices; and, >>> the same >>> is also true for certain Power architectures. >>> > I am not sure if having a certification itself brings recognition. I used= to believe that, but reality proved otherwise. =C2=A0I think we need a pro= duct to bring recognition. we don't just need a certificate, or a product, or any one thing. We need an ecosystem that encourages use and contribution. --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkoia6NaGc7cL=AdrFvYmkW7ch8h4SegExR_wQqbv5SyQ>