From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jun  1 10:22:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA27883
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca (taob@tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca [207.181.89.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27877
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 10:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (taob@localhost)
          by tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP
	  id NAA21432; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:17:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:17:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Tao <taob@nbc.netcom.ca>
To: Brian Litzinger <brian@mpress.com>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>,
        FREEBSD-QUESTIONS <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: 1 step forward 2 steps back
In-Reply-To: <19970528133105.03570@mpress.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970601131704.21528R-100000@tor-adm1.nbc.netcom.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 28 May 1997, Brian Litzinger wrote:
> 
> I've noticed the same thing.  Happens most often when we run vipw.
> Could we upgrade the vi to something more modern.  8-)

    I vote for vim.  :)  There really is no other choice.  ;-)
-- 
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@netcom.ca)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"