From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 15 12:08:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734DA53A; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de) Received: from www94.your-server.de (www94.your-server.de [213.133.104.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309582BE7; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [92.230.246.142] (helo=[192.168.178.33]) by www94.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1VW3Pu-0002v5-83; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:08:02 +0200 Subject: Re: Update fails for kactivitymanagerd-4.10.5_1 From: Mathias Picker To: Alberto Villa In-Reply-To: References: <20131015070610.6339d381@scorpio> <20131015114329.GQ91605@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: virtual earth GmbH Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:07:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1381838878.3653.4.camel@mp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: Mathias.Picker@virtual-earth.de X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.6/17962/Tue Oct 15 04:35:20 2013) Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:08:10 -0000 Am Dienstag, den 15.10.2013, 13:57 +0200 schrieb Alberto Villa: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > We have to limit the number of compilers we do support, and given the different > > possible options people can have: CLANG_IS_CC WITHOUT_CLANG WITHOUT_GCC it would > > be a nightmare to support all combinaison. > > Actually I was discussing another issue, that is: lang/clang33 doesn't > provide c++11 features, according to the attached log. I'll try > changing it to c++11-lib and see what happens, but I think c++11-lang > should be enough. Am i wrong? I just stumbled about this, and c++11-lib solved it for me. Thanks, Mathias