From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Jul 10 17:47:08 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA28191
          for security-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:47:08 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA28185
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:47:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA02743; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:44:10 -0700
Message-Id: <199507110044.RAA02743@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: "Michael J. Caughey" <mcaughey@mgsinc.com>
cc: Pete Kruckenberg <pete@dsw.com>, Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>,
        Julian Howard Stacey <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>,
        security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Byet April 95 no ref to screennd 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 1995 12:54:37 PDT."
             <Chameleon.950710131831.mcaughey@loc10.mgsinc.com> 
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:44:09 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

No flames here,  but quite frankly, one would still be insane to do that.

Say I write a piece of firewall code and it has a -bug- in it.  Is that bug
a back-door or what?  It leaves the author with way too much liability.