Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:15:06 -0500
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pre-patch / gmake question
Message-ID:  <20031029201506.GX96543@toxic.magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031029215410.3cbea753.itetcu@apropo.ro>
References:  <20031029215410.3cbea753.itetcu@apropo.ro>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (10.29.2003 @ 1454 PST): Ion-Mihai Tetcu said, in 0.7K: <<
> If for some reason I need to do something like:
> 
> pre-patch:
>         (cd ${WRKDIR}/ && @${GMAKE} -f Makefile.dist)
> 
> is the above  ok or are better way to do it ?
> If I set USE_GMAKE=YES it seems it doesn't get set for the pre-patch
> target.
>> end of "pre-patch / gmake question" from Ion-Mihai Tetcu <<

In general, use post-patch. bsd.gnome.mk takes over pre-patch in many
circumstances. There are other problems with your example, especially
the misplaced @-sign.

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
vectors.cx	>>  adam@vectors.cx	>>  http://www.vectors.cx
magnesium.net	<<  adamw@magnesium.net	<<  http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw
FreeBSD		>>  adamw@FreeBSD.org	>>  http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw
#vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031029201506.GX96543>