From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 5 10:01:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED5BAE0 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E3820BB for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r85A0x3l096290; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:00:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 kib.kiev.ua r85A0x3l096290 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r85A0wDn096285; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:00:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:00:58 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Jonathan Anderson Subject: Re: /usr/lib/private Message-ID: <20130905100058.GR41229@kib.kiev.ua> References: <86zjrut4an.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130905023703.GN41229@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gvMLM4USzlj3SVKc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:01:04 -0000 --gvMLM4USzlj3SVKc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:29AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > Is there any reason not to make it /private/usr/lib (or > /private/usr/lib/platform)? I could see us wanting a /private/usr/include > in the future for e.g. LLVM/Clang headers that things in base (e.g. > lldb) might use but whose stability we don't want to be responsible for. >=20 The libraries (and headers) are not needed in the single-user mode, and we are still trying to maintain the / and /usr split. --gvMLM4USzlj3SVKc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSKFZZAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1B7moQAI7KtMJZKV8cvNKyw+uRigOr lzyipUKPzHDmJVK2HqI110l5+hdu7+V85zstr5bznEZhIBVHThf/gYwvnwgQ/k31 zzS+/XrJHjsoVm4asq6miFVheYZfvYQ7O6wXtxqfaMFhqzBg5Pe8ALy96K1gDWua i9slusuUrrQj4tPxOwrobhW1lk+tQvfXSonHGdM8V6zl8jCpNntV3ThgJzCf3x65 2vbwpZ0UjFicqAu20/qsNix811mXiy67lq1eb+6fEPyJwf+DDYFJzhLBqjpwfHA3 x0QHOCU8vc0nhRAx7c9lxVKb/M302zg6dzu8wU/gk1Xk2m25hDIiF9ipJy4XPN9L UwXxOqH+86D9zc+oHW2dmSStFhVsVQxmrWtS+W2g7FXSIoUfbGyvEmrNbhmIXdku fywBTMeaRWslUiAg0PX131tahvckUvIWHJF/d3cqYZnLrtJv5ohazM0l/qKwhCvg JNHrLHH35RASgzwKZa4CHf5MnlCF3avYHlpenLvWOlup0lvVIdBf0plDeOWKDeTz xTJJ8OT5dZb3MfbuHw9tXSkad7Pk4anxjJ85RwdHyzFSrWGynIFHmb/zwQztrHOD 0K1pT/7AY9A9djQi2b0oySDWMI2FKOdiC4gVOQH46i8JH/sQ3fJiFqNGFL/+pzMj lOWhO0Zpre4FRTvjeihg =mInF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gvMLM4USzlj3SVKc--