From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 15 12:16:16 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: scsi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A98D16A4DD
	for <scsi@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@yahoo-inc.com)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E2F43D92
	for <scsi@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:16:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jhb@yahoo-inc.com)
Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net
	[66.23.211.162]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273A1A3C20
	for <scsi@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@yahoo-inc.com>
To: scsi@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:15:57 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608150815.57259.jhb@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: 
Subject: O_NONBLOCK and /dev/passX devices..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:16:16 -0000

Is there a specific reasons that O_NONBLOCK isn't supported on
/dev/passX devices?  Would it be hard to add support for that?

-- 
John Baldwin