From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Apr 3 11:10:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA09591 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA09577; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199704031910.LAA09577@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: kern/3186: sys call shm_get() broken in 2.2.1-RELEASE, but OK in 2.1.0-RELEASE Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR kern/3186; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" To: paul@kryten.woc.atinc.com Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/3186: sys call shm_get() broken in 2.2.1-RELEASE, but OK in 2.1.0-RELEASE Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 11:07:04 -0800 I hate to ask the obvious question, but is this with SYSVSHM compiled into the kernel? If you're running GENERIC, it's no longer in there by default (and the reason for taking it out escapes me for the moment, to be honest).