From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Mar 11 17:59:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA01807
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au (root@cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au [147.41.41.147])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA01412
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (andrew@localhost) by cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA00249 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 1997 12:53:46 +1100
X-Authentication-Warning: cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au: andrew owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 12:53:46 +1100 (EST)
From: Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au>
X-Sender: andrew@cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2-GAMMA & netatalk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970311155035.2918A-100000@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.970312125024.235A-100000@cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Doug White wrote:

> Actually it builds out of the box.  Should be pretty straightforward.  And
> yes, a Makefile is in there.  :)

Would it be worth doing it up as a port then - even one that did no
modification but just so people could find it easily now the options are
built in to the kernel? 

I am willing to do it if people think its a good idea... 

Andrew