Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:28:21 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portupgrade -- revisited Message-ID: <200303021628.21627.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <87r89pwdwa.fsf@strauser.com> References: <20030302192233.GA326@willow.raggedclown.intra> <200303021415.59947.kstewart@owt.com> <87r89pwdwa.fsf@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 02 March 2003 03:24 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> writes: > > portupgrade -puf portupgrade > > portupgrade -pufr png > > portupgrade -pufr fontconfig > > portupgrade -pufr libxml2 > > portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu > > Interesting. I almost always user `portupgrade -rR foo' without > other options. That way, recursion works in both directions, and > every package that could possibly be affected in any way by upgrading > `foo' gets updated. I've been doing this for months and have never > encountered a problem situation. Has anyone upgraded this way and > still had trouble? The -rR bothers me because it is making a lot of ports that don't need to be updated. I typically have 2 or 3 lines that need updating and -ruf will force them. If I have more than 2 intersections, I do a -ufa. With the -f, you see the messages about x is need by y-z but I will delete it anyway. The way I understand it, a -rR kdebase will rebuild most of XFree86 and etc. The AMD 2000+ uses 6-8 hours to rebuild everything but it will rebuild all of kde-3.1 in 3+. I also create packages on the 2000 for upgrades on my slower machines and ftp the packages to the slower systems. The only difference is that I then use -Pufr instead of -pufr. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303021628.21627.kstewart>