Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:17:51 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomNcbGggbQePi2kBC7uRJm3BenMNKjsqkH5hFLqudsCvg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CALH631=F4bSgNDE4w0qcXGMgGxZRRwCP9n-H4M0c%2B1UEaqWr7Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E147F54.40908@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CACqU3MVLr5VXRovs1uV%2BzHazJi2rrjE9Sp3XzsCPJ0Un06pmDQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110706193636.GA69550@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4E14CCE5.4050906@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed? thanks, Adrian On 7 July 2011 05:00, Hartmann, O. <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl >>> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> =A0wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performin= g >>>>> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switchin= g >>>>> back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler. >>>>> >>>> If you are using MPI in numerical codes, then you want >>>> to use SCHED_4BSD. ?I've posted numerous times about ULE >>>> and its very poor performance when using MPI. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-October/026375= .html >>>> >>> [sarcasm] >>> It is rather funny to see that the post you point out has generated >>> exactly 0 meaningful follow-up then and as you mention later in this >>> thread, the issue still remains today :-) >>> [/sarcasm] >>> >> Apparently, you are privy to my private email exchanges >> with jeffr. >> >> I'm also not sure why you're being sarcastic here. =A0The >> issue was and AFAIK still is a problem for anyone using >> FreeBSD in a HPC cluster. =A0ULE simply performs worse than >> 4BSD. >> > Well, I know only very little people using FreeBSD within a HPC cluster o= r > even for scientific purposes, except myself and some people around here. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomNcbGggbQePi2kBC7uRJm3BenMNKjsqkH5hFLqudsCvg>