From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 03:25:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE191065670 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A214A8FC0A for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAC3PF7K093140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:25:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAC3PFHW093139; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA21197; Fri, 11 Nov 11 19:18:02 PST Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 02:17:50 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: peter@wemm.org Message-Id: <4ebe47ce.gGq91QcdXBP300Km%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201110281426.00013.jhb@freebsd.org> <4EB2C9DD.9090606@FreeBSD.org> <20111104160319.GD6110@elvis.mu.org> <201111080800.32717.jhb@freebsd.org> <6E287E90-AA62-4776-A09D-394D69C9494F@kientzle.com> <1B4CA8AC-8798-40CD-9379-FA0F379558DE@bsdimp.com> <4698F60B-CBF7-4D80-9368-CC6FBD893C0B@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tim@kientzle.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadvise(2) system call X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:25:17 -0000 Peter Wemm wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Tim Kientzle > wrote: > > ... seek(2) is badly broken on tape drives. > > It does nothing and doesn't return an error ... > > Honestly, I think we've got bigger problems to worry about > than whether lseek() works on magnetic tape drives ... True, but failing silently -- doing nothing but not returning an error -- is a POLA violation. Those are worth fixing simply on principle.