From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 12:14:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FF71065673 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AD68FC1C for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so19750675eek.13 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:14:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnqohyQzBs9KbZOBZESLk1k2GhC5z9V1Q5811//iwjg=; b=raheHObS9khJd8uU/LxLedFPHO0FS16a+s4cRgcD8IhEXkqoIvucwM1H9w0O+bTWmm qXe4GjQf2Xst5OZmfIxoGLRmFVPTnME/2R4Z1wnOyHLfQfLJ5DVqIDvijMumERVVFXq6 Buws506gIj5XDRRz5cRBh3vFd95R01j/jnqPs= Received: by 10.14.3.200 with SMTP id 48mr22247987eeh.94.1325679283785; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from green.tandem.local (utwig.xim.bz. [91.216.237.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e12sm68045300eea.5.2012.01.04.04.14.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:14:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0442B0.6020707@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:14:40 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111223 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <201201031036.50837.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120104115753.GF34721@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120104115753.GF34721@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: periodic emails X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:14:45 -0000 04.01.2012 13:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Does security_show_success="YES" suppress the security report entirely > (no mail sent), if no security related issues found? Yes. PS: I also prefer setting *_show_badconfig to 'yes' in case something is just not working right. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.