Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:49:41 -0500
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: m_tag committed
Message-ID:  <5.2.0.9.0.20030123164850.07c4cb58@marble.sentex.ca>
In-Reply-To: <122201c2c323$ae05c2c0$52557f42@errno.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hi,
         Will the behaviour of the FAST_IPSEC code be any different with 
how the current IPSEC interacts with ipfw/ipfw2 and ipfilter ?

         ---Mike

At 01:09 PM 23/01/2003 -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
>As promised I MFC'd the m_tag support.  These changes should have no
>user-visible affect.
>
>I'll wait a day before committing the FAST_IPSEC code.
>
>     Sam
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.0.9.0.20030123164850.07c4cb58>