From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Aug 11 12:25:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA24364 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 12:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lamb.sas.com (daemon@lamb.sas.com [192.35.83.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA24358 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 12:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mozart by lamb.sas.com (5.65c/SAS/Gateway/01-23-95) id AA29339; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:25:12 -0400 Received: from iluvatar.unx.sas.com by mozart (5.65c/SAS/Domains/5-6-90) id AA19509; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:25:04 -0400 From: "John W. DeBoskey" Received: by iluvatar.unx.sas.com (5.65c/SAS/Generic 9.01/3-26-93) id AA02448; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:25:03 -0400 Message-Id: <199708111925.AA02448@iluvatar.unx.sas.com> Subject: General smp & bios questions To: smp@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 15:25:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I've got a couple of questions, for what they're worth... My system has to I/O APIC's in it. The 2nd one is disabled by default in the bios. I also have an entry for 'PIC interrupt Routing', which is set to 'default'. The other choice is 'Through IO APIC'. Does any of this ring any bells? I've left the 2nd APIC disabled since I did not beleive that your code supported more than one of them. Thanks, John -- jwd@unx.sas.com (w) John W. De Boskey (919) 677-8000 x6915