From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Feb 25 10:12:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.77.111.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A0D337B65D; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:12:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1PIBw111375; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:11:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:01:02 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Nik Clayton Cc: John Baldwin , andreas@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj depends on X11 now?!?! Message-ID: <20010225130102.A17696@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <20010224230908.C64525@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010225105947.A68522@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010225105947.A68522@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:59:51AM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 10:59:51AM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > My current thinking is a slave port, ghostscript6-nox11 that eps2png can > depend on instead. There are other options (a WITH_X11 variable, that > sort of thing) that various people on irc have suggested as well. Not > being a prolific porter, I'm going to go with whatever's easiest for me > to implement (viz, a slave port) unless people have specific objections > (or they want to write the code). >=20 > Thoughts? A slave port would have the advantage to offer two different gs binary packages, one with and one without the requirement for X. This would be an advantage for every people, not having to compile the gs port, which is relatively quite large ... O.k., I'd vote for that. Andreas /// --=20 Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 4.2 SMP Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6mPP9d3o+lGxvbLoRAqlLAJ4zLaFtHXZ7F42h50G/lDgW0Wki+wCgn5mJ X4bHtsii3xJ4ywId/iXda6E= =Zytc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message