Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:45:56 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's the Correct git update method keeping local changes Message-ID: <ZCL9pNx6kMTpJZEQ@int21h> In-Reply-To: <a041694f-7c0c-4124-9492-ee6d9949893a@app.fastmail.com> References: <ZCJct8nsBSABpKOL@int21h> <CANCZdfrBtepZExuupfNPGLsJ_S_DzZ9i_ezNEC_SETDFSk4oJw@mail.gmail.com> <a041694f-7c0c-4124-9492-ee6d9949893a@app.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:37:16AM -0700, Pat Maddox wrote: >On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, at 1:39 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> I use the rebase workflow for pending ports commit work. > >Most of the replies say something similar. What are people’s >experiences with poudriere overlay dire? I use two overlays: [1] for sccache-overlay to speed up those ports requiring rust to build [2] to maintain the last-known-good php74 for systems that can't be updated to a supported php version for $REASONS For systems that require [2], they need ports building in a tree that doesn't have the MOVED file, so it uses a different 'default' tree which has 'git rm MOVED' run on it after it updates but before poudriere bulk runs. --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZCL9pNx6kMTpJZEQ>