From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Dec 16 11:34:31 2000
From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 16 11:34:29 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from field.videotron.net (field.videotron.net [205.151.222.108])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BD937B400
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from modemcable213.3-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.201.3.213])
 by field.videotron.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)
 with ESMTP id <0G5O00GFLEDB85@field.videotron.net> for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:34:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:35:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
Subject: Re: Changing the names of some M_flags
In-reply-to: <20001216112130.Y19572@fw.wintelcom.net>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012161435130.34015-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> I think M_DONTWAIT is fine as it was, and M_TRYWAIT instead of M_TRY_WAIT.
> 
> Leaving it as M_DONTWAIT should reduce the delta by quite a bit and
> M_TRYWAIT vs M_TRY_WAIT because you have M_DONTWAIT/M_DONTBLOCK.
> 
> -Alfred

	I agree. Anyone else before I re-roll? :-)

  Cheers, 
  Bosko Milekic
  bmilekic@technokratis.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message