From owner-freebsd-net Sat Dec 16 11:34:31 2000 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 11:34:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from field.videotron.net (field.videotron.net [205.151.222.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BD937B400 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from modemcable213.3-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.201.3.213]) by field.videotron.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8) with ESMTP id <0G5O00GFLEDB85@field.videotron.net> for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:34:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:35:42 -0500 (EST) From: Bosko Milekic Subject: Re: Changing the names of some M_flags In-reply-to: <20001216112130.Y19572@fw.wintelcom.net> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I think M_DONTWAIT is fine as it was, and M_TRYWAIT instead of M_TRY_WAIT. > > Leaving it as M_DONTWAIT should reduce the delta by quite a bit and > M_TRYWAIT vs M_TRY_WAIT because you have M_DONTWAIT/M_DONTBLOCK. > > -Alfred I agree. Anyone else before I re-roll? :-) Cheers, Bosko Milekic bmilekic@technokratis.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message