Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:12:27 -0600 From: greg <gval@mts.net> To: Daniela <dgw@liwest.at> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: sed problem Message-ID: <1075673546.15771.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <200402011952.42130.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200402010138.44102.dgw@liwest.at> <200402011533.58877.dgw@liwest.at> <20040201101027.2b90499d.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <200402011952.42130.dgw@liwest.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 13:52, Daniela wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2004 18:10, Chris Pressey wrote: [... snip ...] > > > > Or you could avoid sh variables and do whatever processing you have to > > do entirely in awk (or perl.) > > I really like csh programming. Everyone says that csh is crap for scripting, > but it isn't. I think Perl is harder than csh. > But let's not start another holy war. I think shell scripting is great to. But what makes it so powerful is the ability to use tools and executables from your path. That would include tools like awk, sed, grep and perl. -- greg <gval@mts.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075673546.15771.10.camel>