From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 10:17:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077BD16A4CE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:17:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from afields.ca (afields.ca [216.194.67.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE3843D2D for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:17:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from afields@afields.ca) Received: from afields.ca (localhost.afields.ca [127.0.0.1]) by afields.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7KAHlng049484 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:17:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from afields@afields.ca) Received: (from afields@localhost) by afields.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7KAHltu049483 for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:17:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from afields) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:17:47 -0400 From: Allan Fields To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040820101747.GJ33859@afields.ca> References: <200408142223.i7EMNdY00919@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408142223.i7EMNdY00919@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Re: GEOM and NetBSD compatibility question X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:17:48 -0000 On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 12:23:39AM +0200, Barry Bouwsma wrote: > [keep replies to the list and I'll catch up later, thanks] > > Servus, > > I had looked at this a couple years ago, without really finding > a solution, and now I'm experiencing this again when trying to > use my NetBSD partition under FreeBSD-CURRENT and GEOM. > > I've applied a hack (first proposed a couple years back) which > allows GEOM to recognize the NetBSD ID. However, GEOM is getting > confused by the NetBSD disklabel. So that there are no dangling references, the patch is likely from thread: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=8519d5064d3bb4b1&rnum=1 > [ snip: relative vs. absolute labels... ] > > thanks > barry bouwsma -- Allan Fields, AFRSL - http://afields.ca 2D4F 6806 D307 0889 6125 C31D F745 0D72 39B4 5541