From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 2 21:23:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C0C106564A; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FF08FC15; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91D1AB939; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:23:01 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "sbruno@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:06:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p20; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <1342197082.2664.4.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <201210010847.53984.jhb@freebsd.org> <1349204730.4246.12.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1349204730.4246.12.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210021706.53942.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: stable/9 panic Bad tailq NEXT(0xffffffff80e52660->tqh_last) != NULL X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:23:02 -0000 On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 3:05:30 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 05:47 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > Can you add extra printfs to see where exactly attach is failing? I > > would > > start with the attach routine in sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib_pci.c: > > > > > > hrm ... interesting side effects. After adding my printf's I don't hit > the panic any more. :-) > > I changed the ret val of acpi_pcib_pci_attach() and put in some > instrumentation in acpi_pcib_attach(). The key value is that > acpi_DeviceIsPresent() appears to be returning FALSE in this case. > > patch used -->http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/acpi_pcib.txt What happens if you just comment out the acpi_DeviceIsPresent() check? -- John Baldwin