Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:33:59 +0100 From: "Niclas Zeising" <niclas.zeising@gmail.com> To: cokane@cokane.org Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Olivier Warin <daffy@xview.net> Subject: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)? Message-ID: <bc292860702150833x616c0419w30b9e7d85a01bdb7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <346a80220702150826k784f6538i8a76655c745b2b5a@mail.gmail.com> References: <17875.18893.789217.224987@canoe.dclg.ca> <200702141255.53501.lists@jnielsen.net> <346a80220702141036j29485688gf052be8f4432eed5@mail.gmail.com> <33BBE265-A5B1-4F82-BF41-84825A7089FC@xview.net> <20070215091900.x3y2c655kwcog48k@webmail.leidinger.net> <346a80220702150826k784f6538i8a76655c745b2b5a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/15/07, Coleman Kane <zombyfork@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > > > > Quoting Olivier Warin <daffy@xview.net> (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007 > > 19:54:09 +0100): > > > > > This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes > > > far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is > > > awfull too. > > > > Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup. > > IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off. > > > > Bye, > > Alexander. > > > > I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a number > of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base > here?). > -- > Coleman We who use the modular xorg tree cant do make fetchindex, we have to do make index... I've never had any problem with portupgrade taking forever to run if i've done a make index and a portsdb -u before running. But then again, I only have somewhere around 350 ports at the moment. //Niclas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bc292860702150833x616c0419w30b9e7d85a01bdb7>
