From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 02:07:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11DE106566B for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C838FC1A for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAG27ShH084307; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:07:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAG27RTv084306; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:07:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:07:27 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Thomas Dickey Message-ID: <20101116020727.GA84292@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20101115183323.I78529@mail101.his.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101115183323.I78529@mail101.his.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving flex and yacc to contrib/, all hell breaks loose? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:07:28 -0000 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:36:44PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > >I just did a diff of /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc and byacc-20100610. > >The changes aren't that large (when ignoring the deleted copyrights > >and the code style changes (going away from, not to KNF). > > He is at best mistaken. Given the various remarks, "best" is unwarranted. > > I've updated my webpage to provide some relevant coverage. > Nice summary. Any reason for not contact Bob Corbett? -- Steve