From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 23 14:02:14 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA23452 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 14:02:14 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA23446 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 22:02:13 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA20144; Fri, 23 Dec 1994 14:01:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: time.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Morgan Davis cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A lighter sup -v? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Dec 94 13:41:03 PST." <199412232141.NAA00495@io.cts.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 1994 14:01:11 -0800 Message-ID: <20143.788220071@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > In using sup, I found that -v is the only way for it to report which > files have been received. However, in addition to that, it wants to > tell you all the files that have been "updated" as well. I assume > that "updated" simply means that "Hey, we checked your file and the > host's file and you don't need to update it." No, actually not. It means "I checked the file and the dates didn't match, even if the contents did, so I'm stamping it again and recording the fact in my sup logs." In most stable situations, you shouldn't even see that most of the time! Jordan