From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 18:03:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7D106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F98FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C32BD23D4F; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A57CD23C84; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4F60DD59.9060006@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:05 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Mark Felder References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:13 -0000 On 3/14/12 1:46 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at > detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get > higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were > Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issues. > > I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f > port does not have a maintainer. > > > http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ > Mark: Thank you for your contributions to FreeBSD. And, a second thank you from the maintainer of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. if you open a PR for an update to p0f, include in the txt of the pr (and in the Makefile), the necessary changes and take over maintainership. I am sure everyone who uses this port in the future will thank you for your efforts. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell