From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  4 00:59:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737316A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2004 00:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C9B43D46
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>;
	Sun,  4 Jan 2004 00:59:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i048xR7E008500;
	Sun, 4 Jan 2004 00:59:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200401040859.i048xR7E008500@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 00:59:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: dejan.lesjak@ijs.si
In-Reply-To: <200401040717.42334.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: ryans@gamersimpact.com
cc: silby@silby.com
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 5.2-RC oerrs and collisions on dc0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 08:59:39 -0000

On  4 Jan, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> On Sunday 04 of January 2004 06:33, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On  4 Jan, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
>> > Hello again,
>> > With this line commented out, I still get both errors and collisions,
>> > twice as much collisions as errors. On another occasion, I also added two
>> > printf lines in here:
>> >                         if (txstat & DC_TXSTAT_EXCESSCOLL)
>> >                                 ifp->if_collisions++;
>> > 				printf("EXCESSCOLL\n");
>> >                         if (txstat & DC_TXSTAT_LATECOLL)
>> >                                 ifp->if_collisions++;
>> > 				printf("LATECOLL\n");
>> > and I constantly get both of those, so this would be where counters go up
>> > if this helps in any way.
>>
>> The driver might be less verbose if you added some braces here.
> 
> Hm.. Yes I did that, however I was writing mail relying on memory which seems 
> to have failed me.

When errors occur in full duplex mode, you might want to print the value
of
	CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_NETCFG)
to verify that the full duplex bit is actually set.