From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 13:33:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F71916A46C; Mon, 21 May 2007 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB6A13C455; Mon, 21 May 2007 13:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242132084; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1F82083; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 734FE5754; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:56 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <200705211021.l4LALdGa025468@repoman.freebsd.org> <86k5v2tnhv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <1179747942.42209.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1179747942.42209.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> (Pav Lucistnik's message of "Mon\, 21 May 2007 13\:45\:42 +0200") Message-ID: <863b1qti7r.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Florent Thoumie , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:33:01 -0000 Pav Lucistnik writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Is this intended as a permanent solution? I realize that having > > USE_XLIB the way it is allows us to support both X.org and XFree86, but > > I would much prefer to see USE_XLIB replaced with something similar to > > USE_XORG, explicitly listing the required libraries. > Sure, but, how do you identify the required libraries in all the ports > that define USE_XLIB today? You don't. You keep the existing behaviour for the USE_XLIB=3Dyes case. There is ample precedent for this, see for instance how USE_PHP is handled in ports/Mk/bsd.php.mk. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no