From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 22 21:14:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B19DA4FE06 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD8E18CE for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id pv2so51570243lbb.1 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nz9oEsO3UQz/M/pZBBLVeCrIIVPVweFo6R7jjOeknQU=; b=s9S0HmUJKEQ9s/s2VQR71niIf1T29SwcZHNVCFBzCmnqEPbck14tveSGAtAPjRlK8J GT/Ame9DJHHYQkFirOR5l+ihw+o1eNik4YNMR+VzwfDNWdrgsQWdoX9BmXhv3PUErWSp pmN6PNn4HJ4Yk1A5CrpcUKD+IPJAqTPuUs7AKX5aTxemlpZCBCrTlwxic1WXnotyqXkj 9w8qk2YY490r7404EoOAKrEepYnEyPSLDKNyo3WNDh4z4LVGzWOM9UvmwIevYxy/MlkQ hQ7ihafJYvwhIA0NzYTOInVaXOxO1MDIkUJrv4lxZcALPs8uEc7PR7D3KA9ViLqysYVw wcpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.168.70 with SMTP id zu6mr9041414lbb.26.1450818858956; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.141.129 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:14:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5678FFE8.4070408@gmail.com> References: <5675574E.3060501@gmail.com> <5678FFE8.4070408@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:14:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: which label to use in mount? From: Ben Woods To: Sergei G Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:14:21 -0000 On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Sergei G wrote: > I think I just found the reason for different reported numbers: > > df -h > /dev/gpt/dback 48G 2.6G 42G 6% /backup > > vs > > df -H > /dev/gpt/dback 52G 2.8G 45G 6% /backup > Nice - that old trick! So do you think you were sometimes typing -h and other times typing -H? Or do you think there is a bug that df reports with different base 1000/1024 for gpt vs ufs labels? Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com