From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mon Nov 16 05:00:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1E4A30740; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ADB11EDC; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: by qkda6 with SMTP id a6so28105684qkd.3; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:00:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T65IOR71+D1YANCbXf80s2UP+C4kkWF6/lNsoj64Gek=; b=f3KjuDQ1RZfP15tLG7kBhw0cqkZvV9PIi1edvEm3UJRg/DuQpo8k3fUgR8LoSW+z+D MiUfMFmU0G8zOqpbJ/HWZL1TsDBF4HRdaQCA2zrXpOAXqsWNQhJXPYycv+Yr+gqMtNc2 cwtncKIKb8zidEXL8CoTyXNe4r1gCwDp5KyzjN8qzL0+X3Hbn90ddo42TE5wn4sbRWfg qwPRhFElSP2QavzR1jJlxbPDy2RacyX1EyFrHmO6gbvfKsX0gzmfZkxC0Xe9bEEuiLXw OR1MQfwir8J8KlFdSUHMyCYip34WS8hbjD/pBULfWflTcvQX2u16sj5WLMisEBF3rsS3 oSGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.52.142 with SMTP id b136mr34189828qka.100.1447650046222; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.32.75 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Nov 2015 21:00:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1447601433.2163074.440262121.5DEBCEDD@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1447601433.2163074.440262121.5DEBCEDD@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java/openjdk8 and jre From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: "ports-secteam@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:00:47 -0000 I don't see a problem with that. u65 is the security fix version and u66 is a bugfix that includes u65. The openjdk project appears to have skipped straight to u66 since both were released simultaneously. >From Oracle's website: "Java SE 8u65 includes important security fixes. Oracle strongly recommends that all Java SE 8 users upgrade to this release. Java SE 8u66 is a patch-set update, including all of 8u65 plus additional features (described in the release notes)." The openjdk website lists u66 as released. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, at 17:52, Robert Simmons wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > The following security vulnerability bug was reported about a week ago. > > Can > > someone mark the ports as insecure, please? > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204269 > > > > This is really annoying. 8u72 won't be available until *January* ?! > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u72.html > > -- > Mark Felder > ports-secteam member > feld@FreeBSD.org >