From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 5 04:22:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96D316A401 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 04:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg [203.81.36.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EACED43D46 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 04:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 32648 invoked from network); 5 May 2006 04:22:43 -0000 Received: from maxwell2.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.192) by smtpgate4.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 5 May 2006 04:22:43 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.122.33]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20060505042242.VOFN28656.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Fri, 5 May 2006 12:22:42 +0800 Message-ID: <445AD300.1020808@pacific.net.sg> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 12:22:24 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anderson References: <445AB56F.8090907@centtech.com> <445AC174.5050102@pacific.net.sg> <445AC46F.30702@centtech.com> <445AD048.80305@pacific.net.sg> <445AD1AC.1070902@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <445AD1AC.1070902@centtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Core Duo - only one cpu being used X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 04:22:47 -0000 Hi, Eric Anderson wrote: > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 11 root 1 171 52 0K 8K CPU1 0 0:00 99.02% > idle: cpu1 > 2653 root 1 128 0 18564K 17560K RUN 0 0:01 34.00% cc1plus could it be that it is just a problem with top itself? It cannot be that CPU1 uses 99% for the idle process and 34% for the compiler. Play with the other sort options. You might find the the idle process for CPU0. Erich