From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 22 16:24:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C5FCFA; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F34E294D; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r8MGOnFc012812; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:24:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <523F19D1.7000707@blackfoot.net> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:24:49 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grarpamp Subject: Re: Gimp package? References: <523B955D.9020101@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:24:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:24:59 -0000 On 09/21/13 13:15, grarpamp wrote: > On 9/19/13, Gary Aitken wrote: >> On 09/19/13 12:46, grarpamp wrote: >> >>> Hi. I see that a gimp port exists so I went to try the gimp package >>> but could not find it in the stable i386 package branches on >>> the FTP server, or in say 9 stable amd64. Is there a problem >>> building or distributing it to FTP or am I missing something? >>> The release packages are usually rather old so I use stable. >>> Thanks. >> >> I have gimp installed under 9.1, amd64, built from ports and it works >> great. I don't know about packages, however. > > Well then that would mean packaging is broken or > the port code hasn't made it to FTP package building yet, > so nobody can use the package for a while now. I wouldn't know about that as I'm not familiar with the mechanism by which official packages are produced. I just wanted to use it so I built it from ports. Sorry I don't have any more info / can't be of more help. Gary