From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 04:53:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8A2991B54 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from dd16522.kasserver.com (dd16522.kasserver.com [85.13.137.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212C61436; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@meixner.or.at) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (82.131.84.115.cable.starman.ee [82.131.84.115]) by dd16522.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3F0A456007; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 06:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx12.chaot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]); by mx12.chaot.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 55db5db6; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:53:25 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <55937245.3050609@meixner.or.at> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:53:25 +0300 From: Johannes Jost Meixner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: AllanJude@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, dchagin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: [CFH] Allan's 64bits CentOS ports OpenPGP: id=C18F24928F1D36EA4FA0B2EF496A9D706250D402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:53:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 All, Allan could use some help reviewing his suite of CentOS 6.6 64bit ports. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1746 What I'd like to see is, moving the Mk/ infrastructure to the point where it can support future, upcoming architectures -- think CentOS 7, recent Fedora version (only the ones that are supported for more than 6 months), etc. I saw a working port of CentOS7 on GitHub, and a working Port of Fedora 19 somewhere... but I don't recall the links. Check Basically, now that dchagin@ committed his 64bit src work, nothing should stop us in getting the ports userland up to scratch. I might not be around to doing it myself. Cheers, - -Johannes - -- Best regards, Johannes Meixner http://www.meixner.or.at -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVk3JCAAoJEElqnXBiUNQC5mMP/i+UzkuqvsCK1sfil8ygYD9d sR2RYPedatSnA8qPH+PMtJYdAhlLC3xcUsfb7oNOgpwNSajAoWB1DslE/nSHjLD2 brccaz/MBIcPJYS+BA3nhKWqri/7smWHOJahpo9K0JJX+VrhBxGtz4Uq+Noz81KB Rj9HnKDgQChCZXtgrFTAOAaXzuzESmzhWiWaLPEjkdyyCQFvAIJAGsiAKelhhRCx lamUF9xAoQiQnTZ7Gi7WkvxJauWNdd9RfROENXNrMV7wBZStXHLpewgSE+xT5xcz 9DsLw7w1wJn9vjs69PlysFMT9izqKwKqB2jG63hmBUaWevixm82gm5Olb0jz/jhd LIs/rQjddu8l/nWtnPoJ+R2LA6kChTl+9uBpie8TaM1fz8WdIk7vxyPZqZiFhkXz 4BZTUntFdKYoK4EYQs0lDrtqyCDIj5N+/UdFPx2F1OKp/q5va6SYZJ4sfZjbSVhV Q8sc6ewmgzO2RPzhCI8Hzqlz8XGrwkI2SClUbWShK7E3nRYfMBNjzV7Tgb/F0kh1 hYU+J2PLgu+DtJ1R+VxNl7iwM2M4NQAF5Q9rl65c5d5mdpw651k4X7oID1F+IgKs b85eTuJxOR6lxEXutwlYYlKWwXQ4x67BMqdVzQeRofU4WU3WZ5VQ5RKHPdwzFUpJ YXyYAsXIPnI79eDpLyKU =s5Vc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----