From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 16 2:36: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49614BDE for ; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 02:35:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA27426; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:34:53 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:34:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: David Schwartz Cc: Phil Regnauld , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? In-Reply-To: <000001bece29$22a82b20$021d85d1@youwant.to> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > > FFS is even better: it doesn't fragment. > > Microsoft swore tat NTFS didn't fragement for a very long time. It wasn't > until someone else wrote a degramenter and demonstrated that it could result > in performance gains that Microsoft was ultimately forced to admit that NTFS > might fragment a little bit, every once in a while. > > DS > Fragment a little bit, once in a while???? Holy Cow!!! It fragments quite a bit, in no time at all, and the perfomance penalty is bad. Itjust depends on whatyou do. Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message